As another poster said below, AR covered this ground in its April 2000 article, "Don't Write Off the Liberals". http://www.amren.com/archiv...
My two cents is as follows:
Show a white liberal that non-whites don't value what he values, and that a non-white America, or a non-white other Western nation, will be a mortal threat to what he holds dear. (I exclude East Asian states like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan etc). That to retain what he values, he must support whites remaining a majority in our nations.
Economic equality. Non-white nations are not middle class societies. Instead they tend to have a tiny ultra rich elite and vast masses of miserably poor peasants and slum-dwelling proles, locked in vicious, zero-sum-game political or even military conflict, with fascist or monarchist tyrants serving the elite or far-left Marxist demagogues serving the radicalized masses.
Robust, honest public institutions. Non-white nations have ineffective governments that either do too little (allowing street crime, organized crime, and/or terrorism to run rampant), or overbearing governments that stifle economic and civic life. Or both - what Sam Francis called anarcho-tyranny. And always, rampant corruption from top to bottom, extreme cynicism, and an absence of any public spirit or civic virtue.
Fair trials, presumption of innocence, exclusionary rule, restrained law enforcement. Nobody wants to be a defendant in a Third World kangaroo courtroom. Nobody wants to be a target of police in the Third World. Even in America, blacks are more likely to be shot by black cops than white cops. In other words, the blacker the police get, the more in danger black citizens are from police.
Political freedom, free elections, multi party democracy. The Third World routine is presidents for life, absolute monarchs, sham elections, rubber-stamp legislatures, one-party states or bogus opposition parties, real opposition parties banned or denied access to media, etc.
Respect for minorities, women, gays, etc. Third World countries are ridden with vicious racial, religious, tribal, and clan conflict. Any group in power ruthlessly discriminates against rival groups, and actual persecution, massacre, or even attempted genocide is normal. Hispanics have contempt for blacks, and blacks in management, especially in government, are notoriously the source of a vastly disproportionate level of discrimination and harassment complaints. The more non-whites, the worse this situation gets.
Environmental protection, endangered species, humane treatment of animals. Third World countries care nothing for these things. The environmental movement world wide is almost exclusively white, and is often quietly infuriated by black or other non-white poachers shooting endangered megafauna (often to serve stupid "alternative" medicine), burning and clearing rainforest, recklessly polluting, and stubbornly resisting advice and pressure to treat animals with a modicum of mercy.
Secular or religiously neutral government. Non whites are often in thrall to the most backward, fanatical religions and superstitions that make even the liberal bugbear of Mormons, ultra-traditionalist Catholics and Southern-accented evangelical/fundamentalist Protestants look like Unitarians. Jihadist Islam in particular, but also Hindu and animist paganism wasting enormous energy and resources worshiping idols, animals, trees, rocks, etc. All of them reacting with literal deadly violence to secular speakers, advocates for religious tolerance.
Not only is it true that the more non-white a society is, the more likely it is that the illiberal values of non-whites will take over, but also, the more radicalized and racially conscious whites will become. The lily-white Sweden of Gunnar Myrdal's 1950s was racially extremely liberal and though of America as terrible. The heavily white American North was appalled at how anti-black the South was. America looked askance at South Africa, and South Africa viewed the even smaller minority of Rhodesian whites as too radical. As Steve Sailer said, if you don't want whites to vote and act like an aggrieved minority, don't turn us into one.
As another poster said below, AR covered this ground in its April 2000 article, "Don't Write Off the Liberals". http://www.amren.com/archiv...
My two cents is as follows:
Show a white liberal that non-whites don't value what he values, and that a non-white America, or a non-white other Western nation, will be a mortal threat to what he holds dear. (I exclude East Asian states like Japan, South Korea, Taiwan etc). That to retain what he values, he must support whites remaining a majority in our nations.
Economic equality. Non-white nations are not middle class societies. Instead they tend to have a tiny ultra rich elite and vast masses of miserably poor peasants and slum-dwelling proles, locked in vicious, zero-sum-game political or even military conflict, with fascist or monarchist tyrants serving the elite or far-left Marxist demagogues serving the radicalized masses.
Robust, honest public institutions. Non-white nations have ineffective governments that either do too little (allowing street crime, organized crime, and/or terrorism to run rampant), or overbearing governments that stifle economic and civic life. Or both - what Sam Francis called anarcho-tyranny. And always, rampant corruption from top to bottom, extreme cynicism, and an absence of any public spirit or civic virtue.
Fair trials, presumption of innocence, exclusionary rule, restrained law enforcement. Nobody wants to be a defendant in a Third World kangaroo courtroom. Nobody wants to be a target of police in the Third World. Even in America, blacks are more likely to be shot by black cops than white cops. In other words, the blacker the police get, the more in danger black citizens are from police.
Political freedom, free elections, multi party democracy. The Third World routine is presidents for life, absolute monarchs, sham elections, rubber-stamp legislatures, one-party states or bogus opposition parties, real opposition parties banned or denied access to media, etc.
Respect for minorities, women, gays, etc. Third World countries are ridden with vicious racial, religious, tribal, and clan conflict. Any group in power ruthlessly discriminates against rival groups, and actual persecution, massacre, or even attempted genocide is normal. Hispanics have contempt for blacks, and blacks in management, especially in government, are notoriously the source of a vastly disproportionate level of discrimination and harassment complaints. The more non-whites, the worse this situation gets.
Environmental protection, endangered species, humane treatment of animals. Third World countries care nothing for these things. The environmental movement world wide is almost exclusively white, and is often quietly infuriated by black or other non-white poachers shooting endangered megafauna (often to serve stupid "alternative" medicine), burning and clearing rainforest, recklessly polluting, and stubbornly resisting advice and pressure to treat animals with a modicum of mercy.
Secular or religiously neutral government. Non whites are often in thrall to the most backward, fanatical religions and superstitions that make even the liberal bugbear of Mormons, ultra-traditionalist Catholics and Southern-accented evangelical/fundamentalist Protestants look like Unitarians. Jihadist Islam in particular, but also Hindu and animist paganism wasting enormous energy and resources worshiping idols, animals, trees, rocks, etc. All of them reacting with literal deadly violence to secular speakers, advocates for religious tolerance.
Not only is it true that the more non-white a society is, the more likely it is that the illiberal values of non-whites will take over, but also, the more radicalized and racially conscious whites will become. The lily-white Sweden of Gunnar Myrdal's 1950s was racially extremely liberal and though of America as terrible. The heavily white American North was appalled at how anti-black the South was. America looked askance at South Africa, and South Africa viewed the even smaller minority of Rhodesian whites as too radical. As Steve Sailer said, if you don't want whites to vote and act like an aggrieved minority, don't turn us into one.