I think this Nader / "spoiler" question is lousy and a danger in itself. If we accept our votes to be ones own and not rigged, Then we have to impose true ways for voters to have their ability to vote and have the votes count.for the one they want and no questions asked. There is no "spoiler". --ever.
This Nader thing is dangerous because--as we have seen--Bernie felt compelled to say he would withdraw --if it looked like his staying in would become a "spoiler" vote. That influenced the pre-voting public. and Bernie's decision to end and endorse.
If you vote for the winner---is your vote a "spoiler" for the looser? Ridiculous ! And damned right !
I think this Nader / "spoiler" question is lousy and a danger in itself.
If we accept our votes to be ones own and not rigged, Then we have to impose true ways for voters to have their ability to vote and have the votes count.for the one they want and no questions asked.
There is no "spoiler". --ever.
This Nader thing is dangerous because--as we have seen--Bernie felt compelled to say he would withdraw --if it looked like his staying in would become a "spoiler" vote. That influenced the pre-voting public.
and Bernie's decision to end and endorse.
If you vote for the winner---is your vote a "spoiler" for the looser?
Ridiculous ! And damned right !